Skip to content

[action] [PR:23694] Fix Debian repos used for Bullseye-based containers#23760

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202505from
mssonicbld:cherry/202505/23694
Aug 20, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:23694] Fix Debian repos used for Bullseye-based containers#23760
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202505from
mssonicbld:cherry/202505/23694

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

When building a Bullseye-based container with MIRROR_SNAPSHOT=y, the repos used will point to the main Debian repo, but Bullseye packages have been moved to the archive repo. Fix this issue by overriding the DEFAULT_MIRROR_URLS variable.

Note that bullseye-security is still in the main Debian repo, and is not yet on the archive repo.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it

When building a Bullseye-based container with MIRROR_SNAPSHOT=y, the repos used will point to the main Debian repo, but Bullseye packages have been moved to the archive repo. Fix this issue by overriding the `DEFAULT_MIRROR_URLS` variable.

Note that bullseye-security is still in the main Debian repo, and is not yet on the archive repo.

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it

#### How to verify it

<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [ ] 202505

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #23694

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 0cffe88 into sonic-net:202505 Aug 20, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant