Skip to content

[action] [PR:17030] [Mellanox] Remove EEPROM write limitation if it is software control#17694

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202311from
mssonicbld:cherry/202311/17030
Jan 7, 2024
Merged

[action] [PR:17030] [Mellanox] Remove EEPROM write limitation if it is software control#17694
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202311from
mssonicbld:cherry/202311/17030

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Why I did it

When module is under software control (CMIS host management enabled), EEPROM should be controlled by software and there should be no limitation for any write operation.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Remove EEPROM write limitation if a module is under software control

How to verify it

Manual test
UT

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305
  • 202311

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…onic-net#17030)

- Why I did it
When module is under software control (CMIS host management enabled), EEPROM should be controlled by software and there should be no limitation for any write operation.

- How I did it
Remove EEPROM write limitation if a module is under software control

- How to verify it
Manual test
UT
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #17030

@Junchao-Mellanox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 4060f5c into sonic-net:202311 Jan 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants