[FRR] Force disable next hop group support#17344
[FRR] Force disable next hop group support#17344StormLiangMS merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nazarii Hnydyn <[email protected]>
|
@StormLiangMS Can you please review and signoff |
|
Tested on top of 202305 commit https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-buildimage/tree/c8750621779aaa847c1dc1672a48d467071298a6 |
|
hi @nazariig @dgsudharsan could you help to elaborate what's the cons to disable FRR next hop group support? |
I believe there is no cons. If the NOS is using the nexthop group, it will affect performance. However SONiC is not using nexthop group today. Hence there is no impact with respect to SONiC |
|
Please wait for @StormLiangMS's approval |
Signed-off-by: Nazarii Hnydyn [email protected] Closes sonic-net#17345 This W/A was proposed by Nvidia FRR team before the long term solution is ready. Why I did it A W/A to fix default route installation during LAG member flap Work item tracking N/A How I did it Disabled FRR next hop group support How to verify it Do LAG member flap
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202305: #17423 |
|
Hi @yxieca, can you please help to add "Approved for 202311 Branch" tag to this PR? thanks. |
Signed-off-by: Nazarii Hnydyn [email protected] Closes sonic-net#17345 This W/A was proposed by Nvidia FRR team before the long term solution is ready. Why I did it A W/A to fix default route installation during LAG member flap Work item tracking N/A How I did it Disabled FRR next hop group support How to verify it Do LAG member flap
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202311: #17804 |
Signed-off-by: Nazarii Hnydyn [email protected] Closes #17345 This W/A was proposed by Nvidia FRR team before the long term solution is ready. Why I did it A W/A to fix default route installation during LAG member flap Work item tracking N/A How I did it Disabled FRR next hop group support How to verify it Do LAG member flap
This reverts commit 1ff27db.
This reverts commit 1ff27db.
Signed-off-by: Nazarii Hnydyn [email protected] Closes sonic-net#17345 This W/A was proposed by Nvidia FRR team before the long term solution is ready. Why I did it A W/A to fix default route installation during LAG member flap Work item tracking N/A How I did it Disabled FRR next hop group support How to verify it Do LAG member flap
Signed-off-by: Nazarii Hnydyn [email protected] Closes sonic-net#17345 This W/A was proposed by Nvidia FRR team before the long term solution is ready. Why I did it A W/A to fix default route installation during LAG member flap Work item tracking N/A How I did it Disabled FRR next hop group support How to verify it Do LAG member flap
* [frr]: Force disable next hop group support. (#17344) Signed-off-by: Nazarii Hnydyn [email protected] Closes #17345 This W/A was proposed by Nvidia FRR team before the long term solution is ready. Why I did it A W/A to fix default route installation during LAG member flap Work item tracking N/A How I did it Disabled FRR next hop group support How to verify it Do LAG member flap * for dualtor * for UT --------- Co-authored-by: Nazarii Hnydyn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nazarii Hnydyn [email protected]
Closes #17345
This W/A was proposed by Nvidia FRR team before the long term solution is ready.
Why I did it
Work item tracking
How I did it
How to verify it
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)