system-health service_checker should check containers based on asic presence (cherry-pick #13497)#13966
Merged
yxieca merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202205from Feb 28, 2023
Conversation
…onic-net#13497) Why I did it On a supervisor card in a chassis, syncd/teamd/swss/lldp etc dockers are created for each Switch Fabric card. However, not all chassis would have all the switch fabric cards present. In this case, only dockers for Switch Fabrics present would be created. system-health indicates errors in this scenario as it is expecting dockers for all Switch Fabrics (based on NUM_ASIC defined in asic.conf file). system-health process error messages were also altered to indicate which container had the issue; multiple containers may run processes with the same name, which can result in identical system-health error messages, causing ambiguity. How I did it Port container_checker logic from sonic-net#11442 into service_checker for system-health. How to verify it Bringup Supervisor card with one or more missing fabric cards. Execute 'show system-health summary'. The command should not report failure due to missing dockers for the asics on the fabric cards which are not present.
8 tasks
Contributor
Author
gechiang
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2023
Contributor
Author
|
Conflict was from #12563 in master. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
On a supervisor card in a chassis, syncd/teamd/swss/lldp etc dockers are created for each Switch Fabric card. However, not all chassis would have all the switch fabric cards present. In this case, only dockers for Switch Fabrics present would be created.
system-health indicates errors in this scenario as it is expecting dockers for all Switch Fabrics (based on NUM_ASIC defined in asic.conf file).
system-health process error messages were also altered to indicate which container had the issue; multiple containers may run processes with the same name, which can result in identical system-health error messages, causing ambiguity.
How I did it
Cherry-pick #13497 into 202205 and resolve conflicts
How to verify it
Bringup Supervisor card with one or more missing fabric cards. Execute 'show system-health summary'. The command should not report failure due to missing dockers for the asics on the fabric cards which are not present.