Skip to content

Add lossy scheduler for queue 7#12596

Merged
bingwang-ms merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
bingwang-ms:scheduler_q_7
Nov 4, 2022
Merged

Add lossy scheduler for queue 7#12596
bingwang-ms merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
bingwang-ms:scheduler_q_7

Conversation

@bingwang-ms
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bingwang-ms bingwang-ms commented Nov 3, 2022

Why I did it

This PR is to add scheduler for Queue 7 for all ports if tunnel_qos_remap_enable is True.
PR #10176 update the default DSCP_TO_TC_MAP to map DSCP 48 to TC 7, and TC 7 is mapped to Queue 7. However, the scheduler for Queue 7 is missing.
This PR fixed the issue by adding lossy scheduler for Queue 7.
Thanks @stephenxs reporting this issue.

How I did it

This PR fixed the issue by adding lossy scheduler for Queue 7.

How to verify it

Verified by UT.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205

Description for the changelog

This PR is to add scheduler for Queue 7 for all ports if tunnel_qos_remap_enable is True.

Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@stephenxs stephenxs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor comments.

@bingwang-ms bingwang-ms merged commit 6169ae3 into sonic-net:master Nov 4, 2022
bingwang-ms added a commit to bingwang-ms/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
* Add lossy scheduler for queue 7
yxieca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2022
* Add lossy scheduler for queue 7
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants