You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@wen587 In example 3, "keys with same number of elements and different type", if the different types here are sufficiently distinguished, is it supported? For example, both lists have only one key and different type.
typedef report-type {
type enumeration {
enum periodic;
enum stream;
enum once;
}
}
typedef encoding {
type enumeration {
enum JSON_IETF;
enum ASCII;
enum BYTES;
enum PROTO;
}
}
container EXAMPLE {
list LIST_1 { // 1st list
key "report_type";
leaf report_type {
type report-type;
}
}
list LIST_2 { // 2st list
key "encoding";
leaf encoding {
type encoding;
}
}
}
@wen587 In example 3, "keys with same number of elements and different type", if the different types here are sufficiently distinguished, is it supported? For example, both lists have only one key and different type.
typedef report-type {
type enumeration {
enum periodic;
enum stream;
enum once;
}
}
typedef encoding {
type enumeration {
enum JSON_IETF;
enum ASCII;
enum BYTES;
enum PROTO;
}
}
container EXAMPLE {
list LIST_1 { // 1st list
key "report_type";
leaf report_type {
type report-type;
}
}
list LIST_2 { // 2st list
key "encoding";
leaf encoding {
type encoding;
}
}
}
Hi @NanQiSweeper , I believe no.
When using GCU(Generic Config Updater) to add or remove entry, it always match to the LIST_1 as it only compares the length of key.
@wen587 In example 3, "keys with same number of elements and different type", if the different types here are sufficiently distinguished, is it supported? For example, both lists have only one key and different type.
typedef report-type {
type enumeration {
enum periodic;
enum stream;
enum once;
}
}
typedef encoding {
type enumeration {
enum JSON_IETF;
enum ASCII;
enum BYTES;
enum PROTO;
}
}
container EXAMPLE {
list LIST_1 { // 1st list
key "report_type";
leaf report_type {
type report-type;
}
}
list LIST_2 { // 2st list
key "encoding";
leaf encoding {
type encoding;
}
}
}
Hi @NanQiSweeper , I believe no. When using GCU(Generic Config Updater) to add or remove entry, it always match to the LIST_1 as it only compares the length of key.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Enhance Rule#18 in guideline to better describe rule requirement and make YANG LIST unique.