fix(df_redeclaration): remove dataframe redeclaration checks

[ArslanSaleem]

Important

Remove dataframe redeclaration checks from CodeCleaner and associated tests.

• Code Changes:
  • Remove extract_fix_dataframe_redeclarations method from code_cleaning.py.
  • Simplify clean_code method by removing dataframe redeclaration checks.
• Tests:
  • Remove test_extract_fix_dataframe_redeclarations from test_code_cleaning.py.

^{This description was created by for f78284c. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to f78284c in 50 seconds

More details

• Looked at 130 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 6 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. pandasai/core/code_generation/code_cleaning.py:99

• Draft comment:
  Removed 'extract_fix_dataframe_redeclarations'. Confirm that all related functionality was intentionally removed and that no dependent logic remains.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 40% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to confirm their intention regarding the removal of a function. This violates the rule against asking for confirmation of intention. However, it is indirectly suggesting to check for dependent logic, which could be useful. The comment could be rephrased to focus on ensuring that no dependent logic remains, without asking for confirmation.

2. tests/unit_tests/core/code_generation/test_code_cleaning.py:87

• Draft comment:
  Removed 'test_extract_fix_dataframe_redeclarations' to match the removal of the underlying functionality. Verify that the tests fully cover the current behavior.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to verify that the tests fully cover the current behavior, which violates the rule against asking the author to ensure the change is tested. The first part of the comment is purely informative, stating that a test was removed to match the removal of functionality, which is not actionable feedback. Therefore, this comment should not be approved.

3. pandasai/core/code_generation/code_cleaning.py:99

• Draft comment:
  Removed the 'extract_fix_dataframe_redeclarations' function as per the PR scope. Ensure that no other parts of the system rely on this behavior.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that no other parts of the system rely on the removed function, which violates the rule against asking the author to double-check things. The comment should be removed.

4. pandasai/core/code_generation/code_cleaning.py:194

• Draft comment:
  Removed the unused 'clean_code_lines' variable and the call to the removed method. This simplifies the clean_code function and avoids unnecessary code duplication.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

5. pandasai/core/code_generation/code_cleaning.py:11

• Draft comment:
  Since the 'CodeExecutor' is now unused after removing re-declaration checks, consider removing its import to keep the code clean and maintainable.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. tests/unit_tests/core/code_generation/test_code_cleaning.py:87

• Draft comment:
  Removed the 'test_extract_fix_dataframe_redeclarations' unit test to match the removal of the corresponding functionality. Ensure that this removal is intentional.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 30% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the author to ensure the removal is intentional, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation of intention. However, it also provides information about the removal of a unit test, which is relevant to the code change. The comment could be rephrased to focus on the need for unit tests for any new or modified functionality.

Workflow ID: wflow_knVlAnTKrV8W62Ed

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.69%. Comparing base (f01d136) to head (f78284c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1688      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.06%   91.69%   -0.37%     
==========================================
  Files          72       72              
  Lines        2796     2793       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         2574     2561      -13     
- Misses        222      232      +10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	91.69% <100.00%> (-0.37%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.