Skip to content

Conversation

@fossabot
Copy link

@fossabot fossabot commented Nov 8, 2025

Your FOSSA integration was successful! Attached in this PR is a badge and license report to track scan status in your README.

Below are docs for integrating FOSSA license checks into your CI:


Note

Adds FOSSA status badges and a new License section to README.md.

  • Documentation
    • Update README.md:
      • Add FOSSA status shield badge near the top.
      • Add new License section with large FOSSA badge.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit e8d31c1. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added FOSSA status badge to the README introduction and included a new License section with badge at the end of the documentation.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated README.md with two FOSSA-related presentational elements: a status badge inserted near the top and a new License section featuring a larger FOSSA badge at the end. These are purely cosmetic additions with no functional or logic changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation badges and licensing
README.md
Added FOSSA status badge in header and new License section with embedded FOSSA badge

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • No functional changes to review; badges and documentation are cosmetic additions only

Poem

🏛️ A badge adorns the README's brow,
FOSSA shields the code somehow,
License badges stand so tall,
Compliance crowned above it all! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Add license scan report and status' directly and clearly describes the main change: adding FOSSA badge and license report elements to the README.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 03e471c and e8d31c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-29T15:31:15.924Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: selfxyz/self PR: 0
File: packages/mobile-sdk-alpha/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T15:31:15.924Z
Learning: Document API changes with examples, flag breaking changes, note performance and security implications for AI review

Applied to files:

  • README.md
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

2-2: Status badge placement looks good.

The FOSSA status badge is appropriately positioned after the project logo and provides visibility into the license scan status. The badge URL structure is correct.

Comment on lines +103 to +104
## License
[![FOSSA Status](https://app.fossa.com/api/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself.svg?type=large)](https://app.fossa.com/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself?ref=badge_large)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Complete the License section with actual license information.

The License section contains only a FOSSA badge without stating the project's actual license or referencing your LICENSE file. Users need clarity on what license this project operates under (e.g., MIT, Apache 2.0, GPL) and how they can use or contribute to the code.

Add the license type and file reference to the License section:

  ## License
+ This project is licensed under the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file.
+ 
  [![FOSSA Status](https://app.fossa.com/api/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself.svg?type=large)](https://app.fossa.com/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself?ref=badge_large)

If you have a specific license type (e.g., MIT), include it as well:

  ## License
+ This project is licensed under [MIT License](LICENSE).
+ 
  [![FOSSA Status](https://app.fossa.com/api/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself.svg?type=large)](https://app.fossa.com/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself?ref=badge_large)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## License
[![FOSSA Status](https://app.fossa.com/api/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself.svg?type=large)](https://app.fossa.com/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself?ref=badge_large)
## License
This project is licensed under the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file.
[![FOSSA Status](https://app.fossa.com/api/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself.svg?type=large)](https://app.fossa.com/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2Fselfxyz%2Fself?ref=badge_large)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 103–104 the License section currently only shows a
FOSSA badge; update it to explicitly state the project's license (e.g.,
"License: MIT" or whichever applies), add an SPDX identifier, and include a
relative link to the LICENSE file (e.g., "See LICENSE for details") so users can
find the full text; if multiple licenses or special terms apply, list them and
point to the LICENSE or LICENSES directory accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant