Skip to content

Conversation

@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Contributor

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez commented Dec 19, 2023

Reverts #36678, which was marked as "positive review" although not all reviewer concern had been addressed.

I'll set this directly as "positive review" since this is a trivial git revert.

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

@github-actions
Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 29901c4; changes) is ready! 🎉

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Dec 19, 2023

This nonsense really needs to stop.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Dec 19, 2023

It really doesn't work this way, even if you think that a particular PR should be reverted.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Dec 20, 2023

This is obviously not a blocker.

@roed314
Copy link
Contributor

roed314 commented Mar 12, 2024

This PR is not appropriate and is a violation of Sage's code of conduct: directly reverting a PR where you disagree with the community's decision, then giving yourself positive review with a comment that it is a "trivial git revert" is completely unacceptable.

@roed314 roed314 closed this Mar 12, 2024
@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez deleted the revert_conda_baseline branch March 12, 2024 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

disputed PR is waiting for community vote, see https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/IgBYUJl33SQ r: invalid

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants