Explicitly impl Clone for RWArc #8198
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RWArc had a clone() method, but it was part of impl RWArc instead of an implementation of Clone. Stick with the explicit implementation instead of deriving Clone so we can have a docstring. Fixes rust-lang#8052.
Contributor
Author
|
r? @bblum I standardized the docstring on all 3 |
Contributor
|
Landing with #8257. |
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
…p1995 Remove method_call! macro This is possible now that `SymbolStr` is removed from rustc. changelog: none
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
RWArc had a clone() method, but it was part of impl RWArc instead of
an implementation of Clone.
Stick with the explicit implementation instead of deriving Clone so we
can have a docstring.
Fixes #8052.