Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

/// - test addresses used for documentation (192.0.2.0/24, 198.51.100.0/24 and 203.0.113.0/24)
/// - the unspecified address (0.0.0.0)
///
/// [ipv4-sr]: http://goo.gl/RaZ7lg
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any idea why this is a shortened url? Do we have a way to break up long URLs?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

By clicking on it? :p

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To rephrase my previous question: Why don't we just put the target URL here instead of the shortened URL? Not a big deal though, just curious

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe it's to please make tidy's line length check. We should find a better way though. If we add ignore-tidy-linelength to the file then we can use the full URL but then the whole file won't be checked.

/// [ip7][http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/ip.7.html]
/// W. Richard Stevens, p. 891; see also [ip7].
///
/// [ip7]: (http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/ip.7.html)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

std/net/struct.Ipv4Addr.html:63: broken link - std/net/(http:/man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/ip.7.html)

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

Just kidding, wasn't delegated for this one. r=me anyways.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

@frewsxcv give me one second 😉

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: delegate=frewsxcv

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Damn... Let's do it the old way.

@bors: r=frewsxcv rollup

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r-

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r-

(Sorry for the spam)

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=frewsxcv

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 17, 2016

📌 Commit 21f577f has been approved by frewsxcv

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Finally! \o/

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@bors p=-1000

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@bors rollup-

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

Woooo, it's working!

@bors rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 17, 2016

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #37837) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants