Skip to content

Conversation

@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

Fixes #110794

r? @jyn514

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 25, 2023
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member Author

It's worth noting that a similar non-ice-error-on-worker-io-fail.rs is actually fine as is, since -o doesn't use create_dir_all or alike and actually always fails on /does-not-exist/output (although now that I said it... do we need to change this to a local path?...)

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Apr 25, 2023

It's worth noting that a similar non-ice-error-on-worker-io-fail.rs is actually fine as is, since -o doesn't use create_dir_all or alike and actually always fails on /does-not-exist/output (although now that I said it... do we need to change this to a local path?...)

I think this would be nice but not necessary, since it's not failing spuriously anywhere.

Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! r=me with the nit fixed

@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member Author

@jyn514 would -o ./does-not-exist/output work, or would this require something else?

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Apr 25, 2023

@WaffleLapkin that would work for a UI test I think, yes. not 100% sure without trying it.

- Remove unrelated code
- Use a local dir path
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Apr 25, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 25, 2023

📌 Commit e6ed0ca has been approved by jyn514

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 25, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2023
Fix `ui/io-checks/inaccessbile-temp-dir.rs` test

Fixes rust-lang#110794

r? `@jyn514`
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors r-
#110818 (comment)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 25, 2023
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=jyn514 rollup=never

I suspect there might be more CI issues so let's not rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 27, 2023

📌 Commit 1d847b8 has been approved by jyn514

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 27, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 1d847b8 with merge 9a3258f...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jyn514
Pushing 9a3258f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 28, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 9a3258f into rust-lang:master Apr 28, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 28, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (9a3258f): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-2.4%, -2.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.5%, 3.3%] 5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the io-tests branch April 28, 2023 11:11
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
run-make test: using single quotes to not trigger the shell

This test got added in rust-lang#110801.

I'm no expert on Makefiles, but IIUC this command is passed to the shell, which usually tries to execute commands specified in between backticks in double-quoted strings.

Using single quotes should fix this, I think. (Note: Waiting for CI to test this, since I only have a web browser available right now).

r? `@jyn514`

cc `@WaffleLapkin`

Since this is breaking our build bot, even if it is not directly LLVM related: `@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
run-make test: using single quotes to not trigger the shell

This test got added in rust-lang#110801.

I'm no expert on Makefiles, but IIUC this command is passed to the shell, which usually tries to execute commands specified in between backticks in double-quoted strings.

Using single quotes should fix this, I think. (Note: Waiting for CI to test this, since I only have a web browser available right now).

r? ``@jyn514``

cc ``@WaffleLapkin``

Since this is breaking our build bot, even if it is not directly LLVM related: ``@rustbot`` label: +llvm-main
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

tests/ui/io-checks fail locally on master

6 participants