-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
[NLL] Loss of suggestion to introduce a named lifetime parameter #96157
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-NLLArea: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)Area: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsNLL-diagnosticsWorking towards the "diagnostic parity" goalWorking towards the "diagnostic parity" goalT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Description
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-NLLArea: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)Area: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsNLL-diagnosticsWorking towards the "diagnostic parity" goalWorking towards the "diagnostic parity" goalT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
In the
src/test/ui/self/arbitrary_self_types_pin_lifetime_mismatch.base.rstest, we give the suggestion toconsider introducing a named lifetime parameter and update trait if neededunder migrate mode. Under NLL, the error message is imo clearer but we lose that suggestion.