Skip to content

fix: const disagree between rustc and lint missing_const_for_fn#16948

Open
Kokoro2336 wants to merge 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
Kokoro2336:fix/const-disagree
Open

fix: const disagree between rustc and lint missing_const_for_fn#16948
Kokoro2336 wants to merge 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
Kokoro2336:fix/const-disagree

Conversation

@Kokoro2336

@Kokoro2336 Kokoro2336 commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

changelog: [missing_const_for_fn]: const disagreement with rustc.

Fixes #16946

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label May 1, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @llogiq

rustbot has assigned @llogiq.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: 7 candidates
  • 7 candidates expanded to 7 candidates
  • Random selection from Jarcho, dswij, llogiq

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

missing_const_for_fn disagrees with rustc on const inherent impls

3 participants