Skip to content

Conversation

@Centri3
Copy link
Member

@Centri3 Centri3 commented Jun 23, 2023

Closes #11006

This doesn't at all mean this will be a machine applicable suggestion, but this should still be a good improvement :)

changelog: [unnecessary_unwrap]: Suggest reversing then/else if necessary

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 23, 2023

r? @llogiq

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 23, 2023
@Centri3 Centri3 changed the title [`unnecessary_unwrap]: Suggest reversing then/else if necessary [unnecessary_unwrap]: Suggest reversing then/else if necessary Jun 23, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 13, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #11095) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@xFrednet
Copy link
Contributor

Hey this is triage, I'm closing this due to inactivity. Currently, @Centri3 sadly doesn't have the time to continue this implementation. If anyone is interested in continuing this PR, you're more than welcome to create a new PR and push it over the finish line. :D

Thank you to @Centri3 and the reviewers for the time, that you already put into this!

@rustbot label +S-inactive-closed -S-waiting-on-author -S-waiting-on-review

@xFrednet xFrednet closed this Mar 31, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added S-inactive-closed Status: Closed due to inactivity and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Mar 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-inactive-closed Status: Closed due to inactivity

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggestion by unnecessary_unwrap reverses conditions

5 participants