-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
RFC add foreach to iterators #582
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | ||
| - Start Date: 2015-13-01 | ||
| - RFC PR: (leave this empty) | ||
| - Rust Issue: (leave this empty) | ||
|
|
||
| # Summary | ||
|
|
||
| This is a proposal to add .foreach to iterators. | ||
|
|
||
| # Motivation | ||
|
|
||
| After a chain of transformations on an iterator it might be desirable to have a side effecting | ||
| operation that consumes the iterator. Adding .foreach to iterators is proposed, which is a common | ||
| idiom in other languages for performing this operation. While the same effect can be achieved with a | ||
| for loop, in general is considered that flat is better than nested and leads to more readable code. | ||
|
|
||
| # Detailed design | ||
|
|
||
| The design is simple, just syntacting suggar around a loop that consumes the iterator as seen in | ||
| this PR. | ||
|
|
||
| https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21098 | ||
|
|
||
| # Drawbacks | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # Alternatives | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # Unresolved questions | ||
|
|
||
| It has also been discussed in reddit and in the forum: | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/2s5jjs/does_having_foreach_implemented_for_iterators/ | ||
|
|
||
| http://discuss.rust-lang.org/t/add-foreach-method-to-iterators-for-side-effects/1312/3 | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe you mean "syntactic sugar" here.