Skip to content

Conversation

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Jun 24, 2021

Fixes #244.

Either I or @pietroalbini needs to audit where cratesfyi is used in production before this is deployed. I expect it will be annoying to get the systemd unit file to work atomically.

@jyn514 jyn514 added S-waiting-on-review Status: This pull request has been implemented and needs to be reviewed C-technical-debt Category: This makes the code harder to read and modify, but has no impact on end users labels Jun 24, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 changed the title Remove all traces of cratesfyi (to the extend possible) Remove all traces of cratesfyi (to the extent possible) Jun 24, 2021
@Nemo157
Copy link
Contributor

Nemo157 commented Jul 19, 2021

Will existing dev databases need to be recreated/migrated for the username change?

@syphar
Copy link
Member

syphar commented Jul 19, 2021

Will existing dev databases need to be recreated/migrated for the username change?

when using the docker container db, probably yes.

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jul 21, 2021

I'd like to hear from @pietroalbini before merging this I think.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

I likely won't have the time to look into this for the foreseeable future.

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Aug 21, 2023

rust-lang/team#1051

@jyn514 jyn514 closed this Aug 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

C-technical-debt Category: This makes the code harder to read and modify, but has no impact on end users S-waiting-on-review Status: This pull request has been implemented and needs to be reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rename the remaining mentions of cratesfyi to docs-rs, docs_rs or similar.

4 participants