Skip to content

Conversation

@memoryleak47
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #595.

Copy link
Member

@jackh726 jackh726 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple nits, but pretty straightforward!

}
}
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you provide like a one-line comment on each of these for why this test exists (and passes as it is).
Honestly, it's probably:
extern types are always well-formed
and
extern types don't implement any builtin traits

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

jackh726 commented Sep 4, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 4, 2020

📋 Looks like this PR is still in progress, ignoring approval.

Hint: Remove [WIP] from this PR's title when it is ready for review.

@jackh726 jackh726 changed the title [WIP] Extern types Extern types Sep 4, 2020
@jackh726
Copy link
Member

jackh726 commented Sep 4, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 4, 2020

📌 Commit 404bc7e has been approved by jackh726

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 4, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 404bc7e with merge caa7ab5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 4, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jackh726
Pushing caa7ab5 to master...

@bors bors merged commit caa7ab5 into rust-lang:master Sep 4, 2020
@memoryleak47 memoryleak47 deleted the extern branch September 5, 2020 21:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support extern opaque types.

3 participants