experiment: add proc_macro to the index #16228
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-dependency-resolution
Contributor
|
Thanks for the PR! However, I'm not clear on the context here and this might be a bit early to start with a PR. The linked issue has not been accepted, and is marked as needing design. Something of this scope may even need to go through the RFC process due to its scope. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
Adds
proc_macroinformation to the index. Opening as draft as this is still an experiment and isn't ready for merge, especially the publish API. Early feedback would be greatly appreciated 😄See #15834
How to test and review this PR?
Check to see if the tests cover all cases.