Skip to content

Conversation

@jlebon
Copy link
Contributor

@jlebon jlebon commented Nov 26, 2025

This gives a hint useful for anyone interested in reproducible builds.

See also #2219 (comment)

@jlebon jlebon requested a review from a team as a code owner November 26, 2025 14:52
@jlebon jlebon requested review from pmatilai and removed request for a team November 26, 2025 14:52
Copy link
Member

@pmatilai pmatilai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Drop the "For reproducible builds..." part and I'll hit merge.

In an rpm context, a build relates to things done with rpmbuild(1) and rpmtsOrder() doesn't relate at all. And, that goes into opionated territory. Just stating the behavioral fact seems enough to me.

This gives a hint useful for anyone interested in reproducible builds.

See also rpm-software-management#2219 (comment)
@jlebon jlebon force-pushed the pr/guarantee-order branch from 8f9e5d7 to 4d1b753 Compare November 27, 2025 12:33
@jlebon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlebon commented Nov 27, 2025

Done!

@pmatilai pmatilai merged commit b3d5f0a into rpm-software-management:master Nov 28, 2025
1 check passed
@pmatilai
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the patch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants