Skip to content

Conversation

@Karsten1987
Copy link
Contributor

#186 introduces two functions to the RMW interface which are not present when including rmw/rmw.h.
For convenience to the rmw implementer, I think it makes sense to include all functions when including rmw/rmw.h.

#186 introduces two functions to the RMW interface which are not present when including `rmw/rmw.h`.
For convenience to the rmw implementer, I think it makes sense to include all functions when including `rmw/rmw.h`.
@Karsten1987 Karsten1987 self-assigned this Mar 26, 2020
@ivanpauno
Copy link
Member

I'm not quite in favor of "huge" headers, as they make compilation times much slower.
IMO, we shouldn't keep adding things to rmw/rmw.h and similar, but I'm ok with this if somebody else approves.

@audrow audrow changed the base branch from master to rolling June 28, 2022 14:22
@emersonknapp
Copy link
Contributor

@ivanpauno @Karsten1987 @wjwwood should we close this issue? I assume it's no longer relevant.

Copy link
Collaborator

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will go ahead to close this. user can include the header if they want to use introspection of ROS graph and with #207 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants