Skip to content

Conversation

@hidmic
Copy link
Contributor

@hidmic hidmic commented Jul 16, 2020

Precisely what the title says. Connected to #265.

Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <[email protected]>
@hidmic hidmic requested review from clalancette and wjwwood July 17, 2020 13:49
Copy link
Contributor

@clalancette clalancette left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two minor things to fix, but otherwise looking good to me.

@hidmic hidmic force-pushed the hidmic/use-gnu-on-unix branch from 5a4f980 to b86881e Compare July 17, 2020 19:52
@hidmic
Copy link
Contributor Author

hidmic commented Jul 17, 2020

Running CI up to rclcpp and rclpy:

  • Linux using gcc Build Status
  • Linux using clang Build Status (unrelated warnings)
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

Copy link
Contributor

@clalancette clalancette left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me with green CI. I will suggest running CI against everything that uses src/process.c APIs, just to ensure that there is no downstream breakage. I doubt it, but good to check :).

@hidmic
Copy link
Contributor Author

hidmic commented Jul 20, 2020

Ok, all's green. @clalancette @wjwwood anything else?

@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me.

@hidmic
Copy link
Contributor Author

hidmic commented Jul 20, 2020

Ok, cool. Going in!

@hidmic hidmic merged commit 9d772a9 into master Jul 20, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the hidmic/use-gnu-on-unix branch July 20, 2020 20:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants