-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
Add demo of how to use qos overrides #474
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Depends on ros2/rclcpp#1408 |
jacobperron
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with green CI.
wjwwood
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm. It would be good to address the TODO's as in my experience they don't often get addressed otherwise, but in general I think this turned out well.
👍 |
|
I will update how to code a qos validation callback after ros2/rclcpp#1467 gets in, but in the meantime we can get this one in: |
|
I released a new rclcpp rolling version ros/rosdistro#27370 should fix the Rpr checker when it gets merged. |
|
We had a lot of regressions on ci.ros2.org on the day that ros2/rclcpp#1465 went in: https://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_win_rel/1755/#showFailuresLink . We don't yet know the exact cause of those regressions, but the QoS override patch is one of the few things that went in that day. What I'm asking for here is to just hold off on merging this until we've identified which of the patches from Nov 17 caused the regression. That way there is less to back out if we need to do that. Thanks. |
ros2/system_tests#452 is the bug report for those regressions, right? |
|
I don't think there's anything holding this up anymore. |
Agreed. The nightly builds are now really close to green, so whatever lingering problems there were I think we've fixed in the meantime. So I think we can go forward here. |
|
@ros-pull-request-builder retest this please |
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jacob Perron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jacob Perron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jacob Perron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jacob Perron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
224cb05 to
066f427
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
jacobperron
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Simple talker/listener example showing how to use the qos overrides parameters.