Upgrade to Node.js v16#521
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 93.10% // Head: 93.14% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #521 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.10% 93.14% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 174 175 +1
Branches 16 17 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 162 163 +1
Misses 12 12
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
bd75af0 to
530c42f
Compare
It doesn't :( |
c99bf39 to
bebbc6b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <[email protected]>
0b6d8f2 to
3c36554
Compare
|
I was finally able to properly look into the issue. Jobs that run inside Docker fail when running The If I change the workflow config to run the job directly in the runner (i.e., This seems to be the root issue: And the following issues seem relevant:
However, we're not building our own image, we're using an official Ubuntu image. Also, I don't know why this is happening when trying to upgrade to Node 16. |
9015444 to
f8f8a11
Compare
5ace2c2 to
a528d73
Compare
ce987ca to
77f703a
Compare
|
I think I found the underlying issue. The first failure happens when we run OutputThe solution/workaround is therefore to This seems to be a weird mix of the Docker issue I mentioned in my previous comment and I just need to confirm that this issue doesn't affect end users of |
56f4e60 to
896c343
Compare
3c77058 to
8ba40e4
Compare
Except for @types/node @ 16. Versions bumped using ncu, see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22849716. Update code following Typescript version bump, see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/69028217. Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <[email protected]>
8ba40e4 to
3710723
Compare
It doesn't affect end users, as shown in this |
emersonknapp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm! nice followup. the ownership thing is a bit awkward, but not a concern to me
Closes #519
This also bumps versions of all dependencies. I had to work around a user permission/ID issue, see #521 (comment)
Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard [email protected]