This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 23, 2025. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
Add Ubuntu Jammy as a Tier-3 platform. #413
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we be filling down the Source builds for arm64 for Jammy and macOS like we do for Debian and Open Embedded? In Jammy? And in see the parallel in macOS and RHEL? For example I know people are working on macOS on the new Apple silicon with mixed results, but that might warrant community level support statement, and it is likely all new macOS work will be on arm64.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question. To be honest, I'm not sure. Thinking about this a bit more, it might make sense for us to actually get rid of this table entirely and combine it with the "Dependency Requirements" one below. That is, in the "Dependency Requirements" table, instead of "Required" and "Recommended" (which more-or-less correspond to Tier 1 vs Tier 2/3), we instead make that explicitly Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3. And then we call out Ubuntu amd64 and Ubuntu arm64 as separate columns under "Tier 1". It would look something like this:
This would obviously have some repetition as the package versions for Ubuntu 24.04 amd64 and arm64 will be identical, but I think it would be easier to reason about since it would only be one table.
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we move this discussion to a separate issue?