Skip to content

Conversation

@8W9aG
Copy link
Contributor

@8W9aG 8W9aG commented Apr 22, 2025

8W9aG added 2 commits April 22, 2025 11:16
* Verify the behaviour of pydantic clobbering with
the IBM granite project
* We now support >=2 in pydantic so mirror the
tolerances we set in the toml
Copy link
Member

@michaeldwan michaeldwan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Take this approval with a grain of salt... Change seems sensible, but I don't know enough about pedantic to understand the reason. :)

@8W9aG 8W9aG merged commit 2ce4fed into main Apr 24, 2025
21 checks passed
@8W9aG 8W9aG deleted the sackfield/no-pydantic-clobber branch April 24, 2025 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Don't force pydantic to downgrade to <2

3 participants