Add failing test

[jedelbo]

What, How & Why?

☑️ ToDos

• 📝 Changelog update
• 🚦 Tests (or not relevant)
• C-API, if public C++ API changed
• bindgen/spec.yml, if public C++ API changed

[jedelbo]

The added test should match this one: #7987 (comment)
But the test does not fail.
@tgoyne where am I mistaken.

[coveralls-official]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build jorgen.edelbo_424

Details

• 8 of 8 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• 68 unchanged lines in 16 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.005%) to 91.101%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
src/realm/list.cpp	1	87.37%
src/realm/sort_descriptor.cpp	1	94.06%
src/realm/util/serializer.cpp	1	90.43%
src/realm/object-store/shared_realm.cpp	2	91.9%
src/realm/sync/network/http.hpp	2	82.27%
src/realm/sync/instruction_applier.cpp	3	68.01%
src/realm/sync/noinst/protocol_codec.hpp	3	76.27%
src/realm/util/future.hpp	3	95.94%
test/fuzz_group.cpp	3	47.53%
src/realm/table.cpp	4	90.55%

Totals
Change from base Build 2595:	0.005%
Covered Lines:	217168
Relevant Lines:	238382

---

💛 - Coveralls

[jedelbo]

It turns out that the Swift test was verifying the wrong behavior. It would not harm to add this test anyway.