Skip to content

Conversation

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Bump minimum CUDA version from 12.0 to 12.2.


Part of issue:

Bump minimum CUDA version from 12.0 to 12.2.
@jakirkham jakirkham requested a review from a team as a code owner October 29, 2025 21:05
@jakirkham jakirkham requested a review from msarahan October 29, 2025 21:05
@jakirkham jakirkham added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function breaking Breaking change labels Oct 29, 2025
Comment on lines -34 to 43

cuxfilter docker example installation for cuda 12.0, ubuntu 20.04:
cuxfilter docker example installation for cuda 12, ubuntu 20.04:

.. code-block:: bash

docker pull rapidsai/rapidsai:cuda12.0-runtime-ubuntu20.04
docker run --gpus all --rm -it -p 8888:8888 -p 8787:8787 -p 8786:8786 \
rapidsai/rapidsai:cuda12.0-runtime-ubuntu20.04
docker run --gpus all --pull always --rm -it \
--shm-size=1g --ulimit memlock=-1 --ulimit stack=67108864 \
rapidsai/base:25.10-cuda12-py3.13

# open http://localhost:8888
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These docs are pretty out-of-date relative to our current recommendations

We also let the CUDA minor version float to latest in our containers

Have rewritten this based on our current docs. Though maybe we could just link to our install page instead (to avoid this falling out-of-date again)?

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

jakirkham commented Oct 31, 2025

Am seeing the following test failure on CI

FAILED cuxfilter/tests/test_dashboard.py::TestDashBoard::test_variables - AssertionError: assert {'col_1_chart': '6<=col_1<=9'} == {}
  
  Left contains 1 more item:
  {'col_1_chart': '6<=col_1<=9'}
  
  Full diff:
  - {}
  + {
  +     'col_1_chart': '6<=col_1<=9',
  + }

However the changes here are to the docs and dropping on CI matrix job. So this appears unrelated

Could someone please take a closer look?

Edit - Appears this is flaky test and is tracked in issue: #592

@jakirkham jakirkham mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2025
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 0d5f22b into rapidsai:main Oct 31, 2025
74 of 76 checks passed
@jakirkham jakirkham deleted the req_cuda_12.2 branch October 31, 2025 17:49
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks all! 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking Breaking change improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants