CAGRA binary Hamming distance support

[enp1s0]

This PR adds the binary Hamming distance support to CAGRA.

dependency: #612

TODO:

• Add Hamming distance dist_op for CAGRA search
  • Add DistanceType::BinaryHamming (because HammingUnexpanded is not bitwise operation)
• Support graph build
  • Want to use the iterative graph build method that uses the CAGRA search for graph build (anaruse@5a80659) because otherwise the binary Hamming distance support for IVFPQ or NN Descent is additionally required.
• Add CI test
  • GT creation
  • Add test cases
• Test on some benchmark datasets
• Add preprocessing::quantize::binary

[copy-pr-bot]

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

[cjnolet]

/ok to test

[cjnolet]

/ok to test

[enp1s0]

@cjnolet In this PR, I include preprocess::binary::transform, which performs binary quantization. The current algorithm sets a bit to 1 if a corresponding element of the input vector is positive, but is it better to be able to select another algorithm for a future extension?
The current function arguments are:

void transform(raft::resources const& res,
               raft::device_matrix_view<const double, int64_t> dataset,
               raft::device_matrix_view<uint8_t, int64_t> out);

and, for example, is it better to define a param structure and change the function arguments as follows?

enum class binary_quantization_algo_t {set_bit_if_positive};
struct cuvs::cuvs::preprocessing::quantize::binary::params{
    binary_quantization_algo_t algo = binary_quantize_algo_t::set_if_positive;
};
void transform(raft::resources const& res,
               cuvs::cuvs::preprocessing::quantize::binary::params& params,
               raft::device_matrix_view<const double, int64_t> dataset,
               raft::device_matrix_view<uint8_t, int64_t> out);

[cjnolet]

/ok to test

[tfeher]

Thanks @enp1s0 for the PR, it looks great, I just have a few smaller comments.

[enp1s0]

@tfeher Thank you for reviewing the code. I fixed it. Can you review it again?

[tfeher]

Thanks @enp1s0 for the updates, the PR looks good to me!

[cjnolet]

/ok to test

[cjnolet]

/merge