[DO NOT MERGE] cuvs-java: fat jars with libcuvs.so (proof-of-concept)#1311
Closed
jameslamb wants to merge 7 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.10from
jameslamb:java/fat-jar-poc
Closed
[DO NOT MERGE] cuvs-java: fat jars with libcuvs.so (proof-of-concept)#1311jameslamb wants to merge 7 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.10from jameslamb:java/fat-jar-poc
jameslamb wants to merge 7 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.10from
jameslamb:java/fat-jar-poc
Conversation
|
Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually. Contributors can view more details about this message here. |
Member
Author
|
/ok to test |
Member
Author
|
/ok to test |
Member
Author
|
/ok to test |
Member
Author
|
/ok to test |
Member
Author
|
This was here as a proof-of-concept but I'm not planning to take it any farther. Closing it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proof of concept that the goal of #1264 (for #1248) could be accomplished without using docker-in-docker in CI, and by re-using the same images that the rest of RAPIDS uses to build portable manylinux Python wheels.
Created this based on the discussion that led to #1264 (comment)
Notes for Reviewers
This is only meant to demonstrate what's possible... it'd need relevant changes from #1296 + other changes related to artifact organization and naming before being merged.