Compute components_ in DBSCAN#6976
Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intorapidsai:branch-25.08from Jul 7, 2025
Merged
Conversation
This adds support for computing the `components_` attribute of `DBSCAN`. The attribute is only stored if `calc_core_sample_indices=True` (the default), since both are related to the core samples. The number of core samples is much smaller than the number of samples (sometimes it's 0), in practice this adds negligible time and space overhead, but will respect the existing switch if needed.
Member
Author
|
/merge |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds support for computing the
components_attribute ofDBSCAN.The attribute is only stored if
calc_core_sample_indices=True(the default), since both are related to the core samples. The number of core samples is much smaller than the number of samples (sometimes it's 0), in practice this adds negligible time and space overhead, but will respect the existing switch if needed.Fixes #6975.