Skip to content

Update setulb call from Scipy for updated signature of 1.15#6207

Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 6 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.02from
dantegd:fix-scipy-115
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Update setulb call from Scipy for updated signature of 1.15#6207
rapids-bot[bot] merged 6 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.02from
dantegd:fix-scipy-115

Conversation

@dantegd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dantegd dantegd commented Jan 5, 2025

Resolves the immediate update identified in #6206, we still should update things to not use internals of Scipy.

@copy-pr-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Jan 5, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Cython / Python Cython or Python issue label Jan 5, 2025
@dantegd dantegd added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jan 5, 2025
wa[ib],
iwa[ib],
task[ib],
iprint,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we also remove this from the functions' signature if it has no more effect?

@betatim
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

betatim commented Jan 6, 2025

Looks reasonable. One thought I had: can we make it so that cuml works with both scipy < 1.15 and scipy >= 1.15? That would mean having some shim/compatibility built in at the point where we make use of the internal function.

If we don't make it work with multiple versions, then we should bump the minimum version required in the dependencies.

I have a slight preference for supporting several scipy versions instead of increasing the minimum version to 1.15 which is brand new.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ok to test

@dantegd dantegd marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 02:39
@dantegd dantegd requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 02:39
@dantegd dantegd requested review from bdice and cjnolet January 7, 2025 02:39
@vyasr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vyasr commented Jan 8, 2025

This PR is blocking a handful of things now. It looks like the last CI run only failed due to intermittent failures, so I triggered a rerun to hopeful get us to passing.

@vyasr vyasr requested a review from betatim January 8, 2025 16:21
@dantegd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

dantegd commented Jan 8, 2025

/merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working Cython / Python Cython or Python issue non-breaking Non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants