Update cugraph for compatibility with the latest cuco#4111
Update cugraph for compatibility with the latest cuco#4111rapids-bot[bot] merged 16 commits intorapidsai:branch-24.04from
Conversation
7e7d685 to
2db4e84
Compare
seunghwak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Besides the minor comments about naming, looks good to me.
|
/ok to test |
|
/ok to test |
|
/ok to test |
|
The pip devcontainer CI failed because cugraph fetches the proper cuco version but it's still using the "main" cudf branch which doesn't include the changes in rapidsai/cudf#14849.
|
This PR bumps to the latest cuco version which removes experimental namespace and includes multiple bug fixes. CI must pass on these PRs before we can merge this change: - [ ] rapidsai/cudf#14849 - [ ] rapidsai/cugraph#4111 - [ ] rapidsai/raft#2118 Authors: - Yunsong Wang (https://github.com/PointKernel) - Robert Maynard (https://github.com/robertmaynard) Approvers: - Robert Maynard (https://github.com/robertmaynard) - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice) URL: #526
…ix-cuco-merge-conflicts
|
This is ready to go once CI passes. Note the CI will be blocked until this PR gets merged. Thanks! |
|
Can someone please rerun the failed CI? They should pass this time. |
Still failing. Have the artifacts all been updated? |
I think it's because cugraph is using the cuco version from |
|
@ChuckHastings could you please give it another try? rapidsai/raft#2118 just gets merged. |
|
One of the devcontainer builds (like still getting old packages due to the cuco errors in the log). Restarted that job |
|
This is now passing! 🎉 |
|
Going to go ahead and merge as this was already approved above. We were just waiting on CI. Hope that is ok |
|
/merge |
This PR updates cugraph to make it compatible with the latest cuco.
Depends on rapidsai/rapids-cmake#526
CMake changes will be reverted once rapidsai/rapids-cmake#526 is merged.