Skip to content

fix condition to skip CUDA 13 conda-python-tests jobs#312

Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.10from
jameslamb:cuda13.0.1
Sep 22, 2025
Merged

fix condition to skip CUDA 13 conda-python-tests jobs#312
rapids-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.10from
jameslamb:cuda13.0.1

Conversation

@jameslamb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

RAPIDS recently started building and testing against CUDA 13.0.1:

This makes the "skip conda-python-tests jobs on CUDA 13" condition in CI configs a bit more generic, so we won't start picking up CUDA 13.0.1 jobs when this project isn't yet ready for them (#296).

@jameslamb jameslamb added improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Sep 22, 2025
@copy-pr-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Sep 22, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title WIP: fix condition to skip CUDA 13 conda-python-tests jobs fix condition to skip CUDA 13 conda-python-tests jobs Sep 22, 2025
@jameslamb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/ok to test

@jameslamb jameslamb marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2025 18:22
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from a team as a code owner September 22, 2025 18:22
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from AyodeAwe September 22, 2025 18:22
@jameslamb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot Bot merged commit 65c2afe into rapidsai:branch-25.10 Sep 22, 2025
76 checks passed
@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the cuda13.0.1 branch September 22, 2025 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants