Merge miniforge-cuda into ci-imgs

[hcho3]

Addresses rapidsai/build-planning#48

[jakirkham]

Thanks Hyunsu! 🙏

Had a few minor suggestions below

[jameslamb]

Thanks very much! Overall, this looks good to me I like the approach of sharing a single Dockerfile for ci-conda and miniforge-cuda.

Some things I checked, that are working well:

• the matrix in matrix.yaml here as of this PR exactly matches https://github.com/rapidsai/miniforge-cuda/blob/main/matrix.yaml
• the Dockerfile changes here accurately capture the content of https://github.com/rapidsai/miniforge-cuda/blob/main/Dockerfile
• the patterns for tags match what's been published at https://hub.docker.com/r/rapidsai/miniforge-cuda/tags (thanks especially for catching the -base- for miniforge-cuda, I might have missed that)

However, I see 2 things that should be changed:

Ensure intermediate images are getting cleaned up in rapidsai/staging: on DockerHub

I think maybe something is broken with the jobs that delete temporary images?

I still see lots of *-167-* images at https://hub.docker.com/r/rapidsai/staging/tags?page=&page_size=&ordering=&name=-167-. That 167 corresponds to the PR number here on GitHub.

In theory, I think those should be getting removed by this:

ci-imgs/.github/workflows/build-and-publish-images.yaml

Line 67 in 358b5d1

delete-temp-images:

Could you please look into that?

This PR does not finish the work

This PR shouldn't say it "closes" the work to move miniforge-cuda into this repo. Once this is merged and a few days have gone by with no issues, there are a few other things I think need to be done to consider this work complete. I just put those up in a task list at rapidsai/build-planning#48.

[bdice]

This looks fine to me, aside from @jameslamb's comments on intermediate image cleanup and follow-up tasks.

[bdice]

We need to update all these to 12.5. But that can be a follow-up PR.

[bdice]

Ensure intermediate images are getting cleaned up in rapidsai/staging: on DockerHub

I think maybe something is broken with the jobs that delete temporary images?

#172 is handling this in the same way as rapidsai/docker#709.

[jameslamb]

Changes in this PR look good and we should merge this. But please do see the other follow-up items I mentioned before we consider rapidsai/build-planning#48 complete.