Skip to content

Conversation

@tiemvanderdeure
Copy link
Collaborator

Replacing === with isequal should do the trick.

From the documentation of NaN:

Always use isnan or isequal for checking for NaN. Using x === NaN may give unexpected results:

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.90%. Comparing base (f0fad4c) to head (ef3c431).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1110   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.90%   86.90%           
=======================================
  Files          55       55           
  Lines        5338     5338           
=======================================
  Hits         4639     4639           
  Misses        699      699           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tiemvanderdeure
Copy link
Collaborator Author

All green! ✅

@tiemvanderdeure tiemvanderdeure mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2025
@felixcremer
Copy link
Collaborator

Lgtm

@felixcremer felixcremer merged commit 3a8c363 into rafaqz:main Oct 9, 2025
10 checks passed
rafaqz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…tions (#1113)

* do 0.6, 0.7.2 broke for us (#1099)

* Fix tests on julia 1.12 (#1110)

* use isequal instead of === to compare NaN

* drop all and broadcast

* specify DimensionalData.Dimensions to make reference unique in docs

* drop convert method for name to abstractstring

* remove `merge` method for dimstack with iterators of pairs

* add to changelog

---------

Co-authored-by: Lazaro Alonso <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants