khepri_tx_adv: Allow logger macros in transactions

[dumbbell]

Why

We already allow calls such as logger:alert(). It makes sense to allow the functions used by the corresponding ?LOG_*() macros.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (8d0529e) to head (096b413).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on v0.17.x.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/khepri_tx_adv.erl	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           v0.17.x     #377      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    90.06%   90.12%   +0.06%     
===========================================
  Files           22       22              
  Lines         3532     3535       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits          3181     3186       +5     
+ Misses         351      349       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
erlang-26	89.92% <66.66%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
erlang-27	90.09% <66.66%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
erlang-28	90.09% <66.66%> (+0.23%)	⬆️
os-ubuntu-latest	90.12% <66.66%> (+0.23%)	⬆️
os-windows-latest	90.12% <66.66%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.