SNZ calibration protocols

[Edoardo-Pedicillo]

This PR is implementing some protocols for the calibration of the SNZ pulse.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.31973% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.84%. Comparing base (fd11b17) to head (98cfc45).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...c/qibocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/utils.py	93.75%	2 Missing ⚠️
...al/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/snz_optimize.py	99.34%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1151      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.72%   97.84%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         128      131       +3     
  Lines        9644    10042     +398     
==========================================
+ Hits         9425     9826     +401     
+ Misses        219      216       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	97.84% <99.31%> (+0.11%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ibocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ibocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/optimize.py	97.60% <100.00%> (ø)
...ocols/two_qubit_interaction/snz_optimize_t_idle.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
..._qubit_interaction/snz_optimize_t_idle_vs_t_tot.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...rotocols/two_qubit_interaction/virtual_z_phases.py	100.00% <100.00%> (+2.43%)	⬆️
...al/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/snz_optimize.py	99.34% <99.34%> (ø)
...c/qibocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/utils.py	96.29% <93.75%> (-3.71%)	⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[andrea-pasquale]

Thanks @Edoardo-Pedicillo, most of the comments are mostly related to documentation (missing docstrings or leftover print statements).
To better understand what is going on in each protocol it would be nice to have a dedicated page in the documentation (which we could do in another PR if you just want to have this as it is in main).
Before merging it would be nice to enable tests with dummy to make sure that we don't have any silly errors.

[Edoardo-Pedicillo]

I have tested the protocols:

• http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/BKy0CbEJSzO9NObQW64tRw==/
• http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/VGp3efuaQD-YkJL6AGateQ==/
• http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/tSKrhkiPTnC5qlPcvjy3fw==/

[andrea-pasquale]

Thanks @Edoardo-Pedicillo, everything looks good.
I have just a comment removing some print statements.
On another note, we are missing documentation. It would be nice to have a dedicated page where we explain how to run all these SNZ related protocols. Feel free to open an issue and do it in another PR.