Add support for int64_t indices and offsets in TBE inference [11/N]#3264
Add support for int64_t indices and offsets in TBE inference [11/N]#3264q10 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
❌ Deploy Preview for pytorch-fbgemm-docs failed.
|
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
9 similar comments
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
…3264) Summary: X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#365 Parent diff is D64777535 This is a re-land of parts of D63778645 (7C) combined with D63807049 (8). They were reverted earlier due to S460368 (D64618134 and D64618221), but with D64619774 (9) D64705072 (10), and D64777535 (11) in place, the issues with deploying `int64_t`-based index remap arrays should be resolved, at least on the FBGEMM side Differential Revision: D64725653
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64725653 |
|
This pull request has been merged in 00b55af. |
Summary: This is a re-land of parts of D63778645 (7C) combined with D63807049 (8). They were reverted earlier due to S460368 (D64618134 and D64618221), but with D64619774 (9) and D64705072(19) in place, the issues with deploying
int64_t-based index remap arrays should be resolved, at least on the FBGEMM sideDifferential Revision: D64725653