Skip to content

[Backport maintenance/2.17.x] Don't consider Union to always be a type alias#8491

Merged
DanielNoord merged 1 commit into
maintenance/2.17.xfrom
backport-8489-to-maintenance/2.17.x
Mar 23, 2023
Merged

[Backport maintenance/2.17.x] Don't consider Union to always be a type alias#8491
DanielNoord merged 1 commit into
maintenance/2.17.xfrom
backport-8489-to-maintenance/2.17.x

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport 07127ee from #8489.

Co-authored-by: Pierre Sassoulas <pierre.sassoulas@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 07127ee)
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code label Mar 23, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 2.17.2 milestone Mar 23, 2023
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #8491 (3fefae0) into maintenance/2.17.x (b9c1ab3) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/2.17.x    #8491   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage               95.56%   95.56%           
===================================================
  Files                     178      178           
  Lines                   18779    18780    +1     
===================================================
+ Hits                    17947    17948    +1     
  Misses                    832      832           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/base/name_checker/checker.py 98.58% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

@DanielNoord DanielNoord merged commit ebf1952 into maintenance/2.17.x Mar 23, 2023
@DanielNoord DanielNoord deleted the backport-8489-to-maintenance/2.17.x branch March 23, 2023 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants