Documenting compatibility between PyFPDF & fpdf2

[Lucas-C]

Originally suggested by @gmischler there: #433 (reply in thread)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (2b03836) 93.22% compared to head (0148704) 93.22%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 0148704 differs from pull request most recent head c6d8ac9. Consider uploading reports for the commit c6d8ac9 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #885   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.22%   93.22%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        7679     7679           
  Branches     1395     1395           
=======================================
  Hits         7159     7159           
  Misses        328      328           
  Partials      192      192           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
fpdf/fpdf.py	92.55% <ø> (ø)
fpdf/html.py	93.13% <ø> (ø)
fpdf/template.py	90.39% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[gmischler]

Looks good to me! 👍

Along similar lines though: Do we have a list anywhere about features that were added to what was present in PyFPDF? Might be interesting to legacy users as well in deciding about a switch.

[Lucas-C]

Thank you for the review!

Along similar lines though: Do we have a list anywhere about features that were added to what was present in PyFPDF? Might be interesting to legacy users as well in deciding about a switch.

We do not have a comparative list of features,
but fpdf2 features are listed in the documentation home page and in the README.md:
https://github.com/py-pdf/fpdf2#features