Add Vesting to Asset Hubs#269
Add Vesting to Asset Hubs#269fellowship-merge-bot[bot] merged 8 commits intopolkadot-fellows:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Why will anyone else other than W3F want to perform vested transfer of DOT? When people requesting vesting, presumably they want to vest transfer assets in pallet-assets, not the relaychain token. |
For one, the person who requested this was from Talisman, not W3F, for DOT. Two, it would be great if Parity and W3F used Asset Hub instead of the Relay Chain for vested DOT transfers. Three, yes I understand the demand for vested transfers of assets. This PR does not prevent that. |
I agree we also need vesting for pallet-assets instances too, not just pallet-balances. example community request: paritytech/polkadot-sdk#4090 |
acatangiu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add vesting to pallet-assets instances too
That is the plan, but the Vesting pallet requires something with
I don't think we should block the feature of vesting DOT on waiting for these. Asset vesting will probably be another instance of the Vesting pallet anyway, so they have no overlap. |
acatangiu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
adding vesting in two steps: this PR pallet-balances, future PR pallet-assets is fine
|
/merge |
|
Enabled Available commands
For more information see the documentation |
Adds the Vesting pallet to the Asset Hub runtimes, as a few people have requested this feature, and in general the Asset Hubs should provide more balances/asset-related features than the Relay Chain.