Skip to content

Conversation

@kpal81xd
Copy link
Contributor

@kpal81xd kpal81xd commented May 21, 2025

  • Restricts publish workflow to only execute on the master repo playcanvas/engine

@kpal81xd kpal81xd changed the title Workflow fixes Publish workflow repo restriction May 21, 2025
@kpal81xd kpal81xd requested review from a team and Copilot May 21, 2025 12:55
@kpal81xd kpal81xd self-assigned this May 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request adds a condition to restrict the publish workflow to execute only on the master repository, as described in the title and description.

  • Added a conditional check in the publish workflow
  • Restricts the workflow execution based on repository details

@kpal81xd kpal81xd merged commit 2be0a23 into main May 21, 2025
7 checks passed
@kpal81xd kpal81xd deleted the workflow branch May 21, 2025 13:02
kpal81xd added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
* Fix: Ensure publish job runs only for the 'playcanvas' repository owner

* Update .github/workflows/publish.yaml

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
kpal81xd added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
* Fix: Ensure publish job runs only for the 'playcanvas' repository owner

* Update .github/workflows/publish.yaml

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
kpal81xd added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
* Fix: Ensure publish job runs only for the 'playcanvas' repository owner

* Update .github/workflows/publish.yaml

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants