Skip to content

Conversation

@cvvergara
Copy link
Member

Fixes #2931 .

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • Updating NEWS and release notes about FirstSearch functions
  • Adding migration notes about FirstSearch functions
  • (doc) Updating documentation about BFS and DFS
  • (build) updating signatures and update script
  • (src,sql,pgtap,docqueries) pgr_breadthFirstSearch: Standardizing output
  • (src,sql,pgtap,docqueries) pgr_depthFirstSearch: Standardizing output

@pgRouting/admins

@cvvergara cvvergara added this to the Release 4.0.0 milestone Jun 27, 2025
@cvvergara cvvergara requested a review from robe2 June 27, 2025 20:44
@cvvergara cvvergara changed the base branch from main to develop June 27, 2025 20:44
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@cvvergara
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai summary
@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@cvvergara I'll generate a summary and conduct a review of this PR. Let me gather the necessary information first.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get PR information
echo "=== PR Information ==="
gh pr view 2932 --json title,body,author,createdAt,updatedAt,commits,files

echo -e "\n=== Files Changed ==="
gh pr diff 2932 --name-only

echo -e "\n=== Commit Messages ==="
gh pr view 2932 --json commits --jq '.commits[].messageHeadline'

echo -e "\n=== PR Description ==="
gh pr view 2932 --json body --jq '.body'

Length of output: 7316


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the diff for key files to understand the changes better
echo "=== Key Source Code Changes ==="
echo "--- src/breadthFirstSearch/breadthFirstSearch.c ---"
gh pr diff 2932 --name-only | grep "src.*\.c" | head -2 | xargs -I {} gh pr diff 2932 -- {}

echo -e "\n=== SQL Function Changes ==="
echo "--- SQL breadthFirstSearch changes ---"
gh pr diff 2932 -- sql/breadthFirstSearch/breadthFirstSearch.sql | head -50

echo -e "\n=== Documentation Changes ==="
echo "--- BFS documentation changes ---"
gh pr diff 2932 -- doc/traversal/pgr_breadthFirstSearch.rst | head -30

Length of output: 894


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the diff for key files with a different approach
echo "=== Key Source Code Changes ==="
gh pr diff 2932 | grep -A 30 -B 5 "src/breadthFirstSearch/breadthFirstSearch.c"

echo -e "\n=== SQL Function Changes ==="
gh pr diff 2932 | grep -A 50 -B 5 "sql/breadthFirstSearch/breadthFirstSearch.sql"

echo -e "\n=== Documentation Changes ==="
gh pr diff 2932 | grep -A 30 -B 5 "doc/traversal/pgr_breadthFirstSearch.rst"

Length of output: 4621


Now I'll examine a few more key changes to provide a comprehensive review:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the signature changes and migration notes
echo "=== Signature Changes ==="
gh pr diff 2932 | grep -A 10 -B 3 "pgrouting--4.0.sig"

echo -e "\n=== Migration Notes Changes ==="
gh pr diff 2932 | grep -A 20 -B 5 "breadthFirstSearch\|depthFirstSearch" | grep -A 15 -B 5 "migration"

echo -e "\n=== News and Release Notes ==="
gh pr diff 2932 | grep -A 10 -B 3 "NEWS.md\|release_notes"

Length of output: 2203


Based on my analysis of the PR, here's the comprehensive summary and review:

PR Summary

Title: Bfs and dfs standardize
Fixes: #2931

This PR standardizes the output format and API of pgr_breadthFirstSearch and pgr_depthFirstSearch functions to align with pgRouting's spanning tree result format.

Key Changes:

  1. Output Standardization: Both functions now return standardized columns: (seq, depth, start_vid, pred, node, edge, cost, agg_cost) instead of the previous format

  2. Parameter Reordering: Function signatures updated to reorder directed and max_depth parameters for consistency

  3. Input Validation: Added validation for negative max_depth values in C code

  4. Documentation: Updated function documentation, migration notes, NEWS.md, and release notes

  5. Comprehensive Testing: Updated all pgtap tests to match new output format

  6. Build System: Updated function signatures and build scripts

Files Modified: 28 files

  • Source Code: 2 files (breadthFirstSearch.c, depthFirstSearch.c)
  • SQL Functions: 4 files (function definitions and internal functions)
  • Documentation: 8 files (rst files, migration, release notes)
  • Tests: 10 files (pgtap test updates)
  • Build System: 4 files (signatures, build scripts)

Code Review

Strengths

  1. API Consistency: Excellent standardization effort that improves consistency across pgRouting functions
  2. Comprehensive Coverage: All aspects covered - source, SQL, docs, tests, and build system
  3. Input Validation: Proper addition of negative value validation for max_depth
  4. Documentation: Well-documented breaking changes with migration notes

🔍 Observations

  1. Breaking Change Management: This is a significant breaking change properly documented in migration notes
  2. Email Format Change: Privacy-conscious change from @gmail.com to at gmail.com format
  3. Test Coverage: Extensive test updates demonstrate thorough validation of changes
  4. Parameter Reordering: The reordering of parameters (directed, max_depth) improves API consistency

Code Quality

  • Input Validation: ✅ Added proper validation for negative max_depth
  • Error Handling: ✅ Consistent error messages
  • Code Formatting: ✅ Clean code with proper formatting
  • Documentation: ✅ Comprehensive documentation updates

This is a well-executed standardization effort that significantly improves API consistency across pgRouting's traversal functions. The comprehensive approach covering all aspects from source code to documentation demonstrates thorough development practices.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve - This is a high-quality implementation of an important standardization effort.


🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2723
File: tools/developer/run.sh:192-194
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T13:16:44.066Z
Learning: For the pgRouting repository, keep review comments concise and avoid excessive detail in suggestions.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2771
File: sql/common/_checkquery.sql:33-33
Timestamp: 2025-02-27T23:05:28.589Z
Learning: When reviewing PostgreSQL/pgRouting code, respect the maintainer's preference for brevity over additional comments when variable names are descriptive.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2764
File: sql/sigs/pgrouting--3.8.sig:125-136
Timestamp: 2025-02-27T16:33:56.959Z
Learning: The file sql/sigs/pgrouting--*.sig is automatically generated by a command and cannot be manually modified. Comments about naming conventions or other improvements should be directed at the source code that generates these signatures, not at the signature file itself.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2864
File: locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/pgrouting_doc_strings.po:16304-16305
Timestamp: 2025-04-22T22:58:08.854Z
Learning: En el repositorio pgRouting, las traducciones al español se gestionan exclusivamente a través de Weblate, por lo que no se deben sugerir cambios manuales en los archivos .po para ese idioma en las revisiones de PR.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2864
File: locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/pgrouting_doc_strings.po:15446-15454
Timestamp: 2025-04-22T22:59:10.377Z
Learning: En pgRouting, las traducciones al español de las cadenas de documentación (por ejemplo, en `pgrouting_doc_strings.po`) se gestionan a través de Weblate y no se deben sugerir ni modificar directamente en los pull requests.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2723
File: tools/developer/run.sh:62-68
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T13:17:02.243Z
Learning: For pgRouting project, CMake configuration comments should be kept minimal and concise, avoiding extensive explanations of build options and configurations.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2764
File: sql/sigs/pgrouting--3.8.sig:274-275
Timestamp: 2025-02-27T16:34:57.518Z
Learning: The file `sql/sigs/pgrouting--3.8.sig` is auto-generated by a command and should not be modified manually.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2725
File: src/coloring/edgeColoring_driver.cpp:87-87
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T16:17:53.496Z
Learning: Changes to error message handling in pgRouting functions require corresponding updates to pgtap tests to maintain test coverage.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2868
File: NEWS.md:46-47
Timestamp: 2025-04-24T23:34:23.099Z
Learning: For pgRouting, NEWS.md should be updated using the generator script (tools/release-scripts/notes2news.pl) rather than edited directly, which is the correct procedure that the project maintainers follow.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2725
File: src/trsp/trspVia_withPoints_driver.cpp:154-154
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T16:19:16.974Z
Learning: Error messages in pgRouting should be kept minimal and consistent to maintain compatibility with pgtap tests.

Learnt from: cvvergara
PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2864
File: doc/tsp/pgr_TSPeuclidean.rst:55-56
Timestamp: 2025-04-22T22:56:39.572Z
Learning: User cvvergara prefers to handle grammar improvements in separate PRs from spelling/typo corrections.

@cvvergara cvvergara marked this pull request as draft June 27, 2025 21:00
@cvvergara cvvergara marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2025 23:59
@cvvergara
Copy link
Member Author

Will go ahead an merge because I have another ready

@cvvergara cvvergara merged commit ee7ff37 into pgRouting:develop Jun 29, 2025
26 checks passed
@cvvergara cvvergara deleted the BFS-and-DFS-standardize branch June 29, 2025 15:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Standardize output of pgr_(breadth,depth)FirstSearch

1 participant