Fixes #1271 #1295
Fixes #1271 #1295
Conversation
| query.objectId['$in'] = [...new Set(queryIn)]; | ||
|
|
||
| // Need to make sure we don't clobber existing $lt or other constraints on objectId | ||
| if (!('objectId' in query) || typeof query.objectId === 'string') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we move that up? be tough to follow why it's correct to override when typeof query.objectId === 'string' as it's a case managed on L493.
Current coverage is
|
| // Need to make sure we don't clobber existing $lt or other constraints on objectId | ||
| // Need to make sure we don't clobber existing $lt or other constraints on objectId. | ||
| // Clobbering $eq, $in and shorthand $eq (query.objectId === 'string') constraints | ||
| // is expected though. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@drew-gross @flovilmart
I ran into an issue migrating an app to Parse Server and I'm hoping you can shed some light on this. You can see the failing test I wrote here. On api.parse.com and Parse Server <= 2.2.4 this test passes.
I tracked the problem down to this comment. Should we really be clobbering $eq constraints here or should the test linked above pass? The hacky feeling workaround would be to replace query.equalTo("objectId", cake1.id) with query.containedIn("objectId", [cake1.id]) in my test.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@JeremyPlease I believe the test should pass as the query construction seem to be valid. Do you have an idea for the fix?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@flovilmart Check out #2472 and let me know what you think.
4 participants
No description provided.