Merged
Conversation
Ank4n
added
the
R0-no-crate-publish-required
sigurpol
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2025
kianenigma
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2025
alvicsam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2025
## Changes - Updated the `Held Balance` definition to reflect the current behavior. The previous explanation was accurate when staking used locks (which were part of the free balance), but since [staking now uses holds](#5501), the old definition is misleading. This issue was originally pointed out by @michalisFr [here](w3f/polkadot-wiki#6793 (comment)). - Fixed a broken reference in the deprecated doc for `ExposureOf`, which was (ironically) pointing to a non-existent type named `ExistenceOf`. This slipped in during our [mega async staking PR](#8127).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Held Balancedefinition to reflect the current behavior. The previous explanation was accurate when staking used locks (which were part of the free balance), but since staking now uses holds, the old definition is misleading.This issue was originally pointed out by @michalisFr here.
ExposureOf, which was (ironically) pointing to a non-existent type namedExistenceOf. This slipped in during our mega async staking PR.