[XCMv5]Remove XCM testnet NetworkIds#5390
[XCMv5]Remove XCM testnet NetworkIds#5390franciscoaguirre merged 20 commits intoparitytech:xcm-v5from
Conversation
acatangiu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You should not change the definition for existing XCM v3 and v4 versions, but instead, remove the test networks ids in the new upcoming XCM v5 version.
There is a PR for XCMv5: #4826
You should also change this PR's base branch to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/xcm-v5 instead of master, to get your changes added to the xcm-v5 branch.
Oh, I am sorry that I don't know this PR. I will change it. |
…block()` (paritytech#5339) There was no need for it to be `&mut self` since block import can happen concurrently for different blocks and in many cases it was `&mut Arc<dyn BlockImport>` anyway 🤷♂️ Similar in nature to paritytech#4844
The CI isn't happy with the amount of output: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/7035621/raw --------- Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <[email protected]>
9d38797 to
4f16f3c
Compare
ed86293 to
5d15302
Compare
acatangiu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The XCM changes look good 👍
You need to clean up the current PR against xcm-v5 as it also contains unrelated changes coming from other master PRs.
@franciscoaguirre @bkontur besides the foreign assets ids, do we have any other affected storage items?
| let foreign_asset_id_location = Location::new( | ||
| 2, | ||
| [Junction::GlobalConsensus(NetworkId::ByGenesis(WESTEND_GENESIS_HASH))], | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will also need a migration for the bridged assets registered as foreign assets on Rococo and Westend Asset Hubs.
Their IDs are changing now, storage items need migrating.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will also need a migration for the bridged assets registered as foreign assets on Rococo and Westend Asset Hubs.
Their IDs are changing now, storage items need migrating.
Migrates storage to v5?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cc @franciscoaguirre since he looked at same migration for v3->v4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@franciscoaguirre pls provide more info or ref about migration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This will need multi-block migrations, which we don't have the setup for now. I need to work on getting that setup done anyway. When I'm done I'll update here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We're going to merge this as is before the migration. We'll tackle the migration later. Created an issue to track it: #6319
cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/bridge-hub-rococo/src/lib.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/bridge-hub-westend/src/lib.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/bridge-hub-rococo/src/lib.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…lib.rs Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
|
The CI pipeline was cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs. |
acatangiu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, we can migrate the storage on testnets in a separate PR
|
Agreed, just fixing the conflicts |
|
@yrong I'm getting an error here "expected |
Turns out the branch had a weird Cargo.lock. I replaced it with the upstream one and that error was gone |
# Context This PR aims to introduce XCMv5, for now it's in progress and will be updated over time. This branch will serve as a milestone branch for merging in all features we want to add to XCM, roughly outlined [here](polkadot-fellows/xcm-format#60). More features could be added. ## TODO - [x] Migrate foreign assets from v3 to v4 - [x] Setup v5 skeleton - [x] Remove XCMv2 - [x] #5390 - [x] #5585 - [x] #5420 - [x] #5876 - [x] #5971 - [x] #6148 - [x] #6228 Fixes #3434 Fixes #4190 Fixes #5209 Fixes #5241 Fixes #4284 --------- Signed-off-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrii <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joseph Zhao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]>
# Context Close #5241, for more detail, please refer to [RFC0108](polkadot-fellows/RFCs#108) # Changes - Remove `Rococo` and `Westend` from `NetworkId` * Add `Rococo Genesis Hash` and `Westend Genesis Hash` --------- Co-authored-by: Nazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Context
Close #5241, for more detail, please refer to RFC0108
Changes
RococoandWestendfromNetworkIdRococo Genesis HashandWestend Genesis Hash