Update bridges subtree

bridges/primitives/header-chain/src/justification/verification/equivocation.rs

@@ -101,6 +101,13 @@ impl<'a, Header: HeaderT> EquivocationsCollector<'a, Header> {
 }
 
 impl<'a, Header: HeaderT> JustificationVerifier<Header> for EquivocationsCollector<'a, Header> {
+	fn process_duplicate_votes_ancestries(
+		&mut self,
+		_duplicate_votes_ancestries: Vec<usize>,
+	) -> Result<(), JustificationVerificationError> {
+		Ok(())
+	}
+
 	fn process_redundant_vote(
 		&mut self,
 		_precommit_idx: usize,

bridges/primitives/header-chain/src/justification/verification/mod.rs

@@ -27,7 +27,13 @@ use finality_grandpa::voter_set::VoterSet;
 use sp_consensus_grandpa::{AuthorityId, AuthoritySignature, SetId};
 use sp_runtime::{traits::Header as HeaderT, RuntimeDebug};
 use sp_std::{
-	collections::{btree_map::BTreeMap, btree_set::BTreeSet},
+	collections::{
+		btree_map::{
+			BTreeMap,
+			Entry::{Occupied, Vacant},
+		},
+		btree_set::BTreeSet,
+	},
 	prelude::*,
 };
 
@@ -44,23 +50,40 @@ pub struct AncestryChain<Header: HeaderT> {
 	/// We expect all forks in the ancestry chain to be descendants of base.
 	base: HeaderId<Header::Hash, Header::Number>,
 	/// Header hash => parent header hash mapping.
-	pub parents: BTreeMap<Header::Hash, Header::Hash>,
+	parents: BTreeMap<Header::Hash, Header::Hash>,
 	/// Hashes of headers that were not visited by `ancestry()`.
-	pub unvisited: BTreeSet<Header::Hash>,
+	unvisited: BTreeSet<Header::Hash>,
 }
 
 impl<Header: HeaderT> AncestryChain<Header> {
-	/// Create new ancestry chain.
-	pub fn new(justification: &GrandpaJustification<Header>) -> AncestryChain<Header> {
+	/// Creates a new instance of `AncestryChain` starting from a `GrandpaJustification`.
+	///
+	/// Returns the `AncestryChain` and a `Vec` containing the `votes_ancestries` entries
+	/// that were ignored when creating it, because they are duplicates.
+	pub fn new(
+		justification: &GrandpaJustification<Header>,
+	) -> (AncestryChain<Header>, Vec<usize>) {
 		let mut parents = BTreeMap::new();
 		let mut unvisited = BTreeSet::new();
-		for ancestor in &justification.votes_ancestries {
+		let mut ignored_idxs = Vec::new();
+		for (idx, ancestor) in justification.votes_ancestries.iter().enumerate() {
 			let hash = ancestor.hash();
-			let parent_hash = *ancestor.parent_hash();
-			parents.insert(hash, parent_hash);
-			unvisited.insert(hash);
+			match parents.entry(hash) {
+				Occupied(_) => {
+					ignored_idxs.push(idx);
+				},
+				Vacant(entry) => {
+					entry.insert(*ancestor.parent_hash());
+					unvisited.insert(hash);
+				},
+			}
 		}
-		AncestryChain { base: justification.commit_target_id(), parents, unvisited }
+		(AncestryChain { base: justification.commit_target_id(), parents, unvisited }, ignored_idxs)
+	}
+
+	/// Returns the hash of a block's parent if the block is present in the ancestry.
+	pub fn parent_hash_of(&self, hash: &Header::Hash) -> Option<&Header::Hash> {
+		self.parents.get(hash)
 	}
 
 	/// Returns a route if the precommit target block is a descendant of the `base` block.
@@ -80,7 +103,7 @@ impl<Header: HeaderT> AncestryChain<Header> {
 				break
 			}
 
-			current_hash = match self.parents.get(&current_hash) {
+			current_hash = match self.parent_hash_of(&current_hash) {
 				Some(parent_hash) => {
 					let is_visited_before = self.unvisited.get(&current_hash).is_none();
 					if is_visited_before {
@@ -117,6 +140,8 @@ pub enum Error {
 	InvalidAuthorityList,
 	/// Justification is finalizing unexpected header.
 	InvalidJustificationTarget,
+	/// The justification contains duplicate headers in its `votes_ancestries` field.
+	DuplicateVotesAncestries,
 	/// Error validating a precommit
 	Precommit(PrecommitError),
 	/// The cumulative weight of all votes in the justification is not enough to justify commit
@@ -168,6 +193,12 @@ enum IterationFlow {
 
 /// Verification callbacks.
 trait JustificationVerifier<Header: HeaderT> {
+	/// Called when there are duplicate headers in the votes ancestries.
+	fn process_duplicate_votes_ancestries(
+		&mut self,
+		duplicate_votes_ancestries: Vec<usize>,
+	) -> Result<(), Error>;
+
 	fn process_redundant_vote(
 		&mut self,
 		precommit_idx: usize,
@@ -216,10 +247,14 @@ trait JustificationVerifier<Header: HeaderT> {
 		}
 
 		let threshold = context.voter_set.threshold().get();
-		let mut chain = AncestryChain::new(justification);
+		let (mut chain, ignored_idxs) = AncestryChain::new(justification);
 		let mut signature_buffer = Vec::new();
 		let mut cumulative_weight = 0u64;
 
+		if !ignored_idxs.is_empty() {
+			self.process_duplicate_votes_ancestries(ignored_idxs)?;
+		}
+
 		for (precommit_idx, signed) in justification.commit.precommits.iter().enumerate() {
 			if cumulative_weight >= threshold {
 				let action =

bridges/primitives/header-chain/src/justification/verification/optimizer.rs

@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct JustificationOptimizer<Header: HeaderT> {
 	votes: BTreeSet<AuthorityId>,
 
 	extra_precommits: Vec<usize>,
+	duplicate_votes_ancestries_idxs: Vec<usize>,
 	redundant_votes_ancestries: BTreeSet<Header::Hash>,
 }
 
@@ -41,6 +42,11 @@ impl<Header: HeaderT> JustificationOptimizer<Header> {
 		for invalid_precommit_idx in self.extra_precommits.into_iter().rev() {
 			justification.commit.precommits.remove(invalid_precommit_idx);
 		}
+		if !self.duplicate_votes_ancestries_idxs.is_empty() {
+			for idx in self.duplicate_votes_ancestries_idxs.iter().rev() {
+				justification.votes_ancestries.swap_remove(*idx);
+			}
+		}
 		if !self.redundant_votes_ancestries.is_empty() {
 			justification
 				.votes_ancestries
@@ -50,6 +56,14 @@ impl<Header: HeaderT> JustificationOptimizer<Header> {
 }
 
 impl<Header: HeaderT> JustificationVerifier<Header> for JustificationOptimizer<Header> {
+	fn process_duplicate_votes_ancestries(
+		&mut self,
+		duplicate_votes_ancestries: Vec<usize>,
+	) -> Result<(), Error> {
+		self.duplicate_votes_ancestries_idxs = duplicate_votes_ancestries.to_vec();
+		Ok(())
+	}
+
 	fn process_redundant_vote(
 		&mut self,
 		precommit_idx: usize,
@@ -118,6 +132,7 @@ pub fn verify_and_optimize_justification<Header: HeaderT>(
 	let mut optimizer = JustificationOptimizer {
 		votes: BTreeSet::new(),
 		extra_precommits: vec![],
+		duplicate_votes_ancestries_idxs: vec![],
 		redundant_votes_ancestries: Default::default(),
 	};
 	optimizer.verify_justification(finalized_target, context, justification)?;

bridges/primitives/header-chain/src/justification/verification/strict.rs

@@ -26,14 +26,21 @@ use crate::justification::verification::{
 };
 use sp_consensus_grandpa::AuthorityId;
 use sp_runtime::traits::Header as HeaderT;
-use sp_std::collections::btree_set::BTreeSet;
+use sp_std::{collections::btree_set::BTreeSet, vec::Vec};
 
 /// Verification callbacks that reject all unknown, duplicate or redundant votes.
 struct StrictJustificationVerifier {
 	votes: BTreeSet<AuthorityId>,
 }
 
 impl<Header: HeaderT> JustificationVerifier<Header> for StrictJustificationVerifier {
+	fn process_duplicate_votes_ancestries(
+		&mut self,
+		_duplicate_votes_ancestries: Vec<usize>,
+	) -> Result<(), Error> {
+		Err(Error::DuplicateVotesAncestries)
+	}
+
 	fn process_redundant_vote(
 		&mut self,
 		_precommit_idx: usize,

bridges/primitives/header-chain/tests/implementation_match.rs

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct AncestryChain(bp_header_chain::justification::AncestryChain<TestHeader>);
 
 impl AncestryChain {
 	fn new(justification: &GrandpaJustification<TestHeader>) -> Self {
-		Self(bp_header_chain::justification::AncestryChain::new(justification))
+		Self(bp_header_chain::justification::AncestryChain::new(justification).0)
 	}
 }
 
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ impl finality_grandpa::Chain<TestHash, TestNumber> for AncestryChain {
 			if current_hash == base {
 				break
 			}
-			match self.0.parents.get(&current_hash) {
+			match self.0.parent_hash_of(&current_hash) {
 				Some(parent_hash) => {
 					current_hash = *parent_hash;
 					route.push(current_hash);

bridges/primitives/header-chain/tests/justification/optimizer.rs

@@ -158,6 +158,26 @@ fn unrelated_ancestry_votes_are_removed_by_optimizer() {
 	assert_eq!(num_precommits_before - 1, num_precommits_after);
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn duplicate_votes_ancestries_are_removed_by_optimizer() {
+	let mut justification = make_default_justification::<TestHeader>(&test_header(1));
+	let optimized_votes_ancestries = justification.votes_ancestries.clone();
+	justification.votes_ancestries = justification
+		.votes_ancestries
+		.into_iter()
+		.flat_map(|item| std::iter::repeat(item).take(3))
+		.collect();
+
+	verify_and_optimize_justification::<TestHeader>(
+		header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
+		&verification_context(TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID),
+		&mut justification,
+	)
+	.unwrap();
+
+	assert_eq!(justification.votes_ancestries, optimized_votes_ancestries);
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn redundant_votes_ancestries_are_removed_by_optimizer() {
 	let mut justification = make_default_justification::<TestHeader>(&test_header(1));

bridges/primitives/header-chain/tests/justification/strict.rs

@@ -149,7 +149,21 @@ fn justification_with_invalid_authority_signature_rejected() {
 }
 
 #[test]
-fn justification_with_invalid_precommit_ancestry() {
+fn justification_with_duplicate_votes_ancestry() {
+	let mut justification = make_default_justification::<TestHeader>(&test_header(1));
+	justification.votes_ancestries.push(justification.votes_ancestries[0].clone());
+
+	assert_eq!(
+		verify_justification::<TestHeader>(
+			header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
+			&verification_context(TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID),
+			&justification,
+		),
+		Err(JustificationVerificationError::DuplicateVotesAncestries),
+	);
+}
+#[test]
+fn justification_with_redundant_votes_ancestry() {
 	let mut justification = make_default_justification::<TestHeader>(&test_header(1));
 	justification.votes_ancestries.push(test_header(10));