Pending Rococo benchmarks

[brunopgalvao]

Follow up to paritytech/polkadot#5052

Generate Rococo weights for the following:

The following weights were copied from Polkadot and need to be re-generated for Rococo

• runtime_common_crowdloan.rs
• pallet_collective.rs
• pallet_membership.rs
• pallet_session.rs

Additionally, XCM needs to be added as a benchmark for Rococo.

• Add XCM benchmark and generate weights

[ggwpez]

Please also have a look at the comments from the first MR, since there seems to be some mixup.

[shawntabrizi]

Adding XCM benchmarks is not trivial, and probably something that should be put off for later.

These last few benchmarks we can handle.

[coderobe]

I'm going to add rococo to the existing weights benchmarking pipelines anyway which will take care of regenerating the weights

[nuke-web3]

Checking in here, is this good to close now cc @brunopgalvao @al3mart ?

[brunopgalvao]

This can be closed when this issue is closed: paritytech/polkadot#5617 as it has the XCM benchmarks in there.

[NachoPal]

This can be closed when this issue is closed: paritytech/polkadot#5617 as it has the XCM benchmarks in there.

We don't want pallet_session benchmarks to be a blocker of paritytech/polkadot#5617, runtime upgrade can happen with the current weights.

XCM weights will be added.

[NachoPal]

My findings about the state of Rococo benchmarks after paritytech/polkadot#5617 is merged.

• Issue with pallet_parahacins_paras_inherent Inherent filtering follow up polkadot#4305

  2022-07-11 19:22:21 panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
    left: `1`,
   right: `101`', /Users/nacho/Desktop/PARITY/Repos/polkadot/runtime/parachains/src/paras_inherent/benchmarking.rs:119:9
  

  Last commit in the file is 8 months ago, so it seems it has been failing since then

• These two have to be run manually and not with the script (10 months old in Kusama) technical committee is using the weight of council, but should have its own generated weight instead polkadot#3511

  • pallet_collective_technical_commitee
  • pallet_collective instead of pallet_collective_council

• pallet_session was removed because it will fail → https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/3273/benchmark-session-pallet-fails-without-pallet-staking

• pallet_recovey generated weights but not added (not in Kusama either)

[brunopgalvao]

@ggwpez anything we can do here?

[ggwpez]

Yea I think I know whats going on. Fix should be trivial, will open an MR.

[ggwpez]

Ah actually not sure anymore. I thought it was easy, but not that much anymore.
Should this not already be fixed if the Rococo runtime is the same as Kusama?
Somehow the benches still fail on the udpated-rococo-runtime MR...

[NachoPal]

Ah actually not sure anymore. I thought it was easy, but not that much anymore. Should this not already be fixed if the Rococo runtime is the same as Kusama? Somehow the benches still fail on the udpated-rococo-runtime MR...

We don't want to block the PR because of the benchmarks. That PR has been waiting already too long. In addition, since those benchmarks apparently never worked, it doesn't seem critical to have them fixed before the runtime upgrade.

We'd like to address them in a different PR.