Skip to content

Conversation

@rwols
Copy link
Contributor

@rwols rwols commented Jun 12, 2020

During a textDocument/rename, it is possible that Jedi proposes changes in files
that have not yet been opened with textDocument/didOpen. In that case, we must
put "version": None as the document version.

Note that rope does not have this behavior.

closes #816

During a textDocument/rename, it is possible that Jedi proposes changes in files
that have not yet been opened with textDocument/didOpen. In that case, we must
put "version": None as the document version.

Note that rope does not have this behavior.
@palantirtech
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your interest in palantir/python-language-server, @rwols! Before we can accept your pull request, you need to sign our contributor license agreement - just visit https://cla.palantir.com/ and follow the instructions. Once you sign, I'll automatically update this pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks @rwols!

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 added this to the 0.33.2 milestone Jun 18, 2020
@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 merged commit 10cd98c into palantir:develop Jun 18, 2020
@rwols rwols deleted the unopened-documents-rename branch June 19, 2020 20:43
@rwols
Copy link
Contributor Author

rwols commented Jun 19, 2020

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The returned VersionedTextDocumentIdentifiers from textDocument/rename have a too high document version

3 participants